\"Sales Woes For GW\" -Really Intreresting!

albufas

New member
i have friends who plays WH with other companys miniatures that are less expensive and in some cases are more cool and detail.
 

Ebonbuddha

New member
Yeah. It is doomed it seems. Mithril stuff had (has?) more longevity. But I blame it on the actual sculpts instead of GW. I didn\'t like them. I did like the horses. They make great cavalry models as opposed to the static plastic horses of the Empire armies. The Ring wraiths are good too.

Originally posted by funnymouth
it seems obveous that the lotr line is doomed - i think the line is dandy but it just doesnt have staying power with the gamers who will buy the bulk of the minis, and its also too specific; its great materrial but most people want to express their own creativity.
 

Ebonbuddha

New member
I think everyone knows people who do that. You use to not have to bother doing that. Back in the old days (God! I sound like a coffin dodger lol) There were a lot more variety in the Citadel, Marauder line. So your army always had a \"unique\" look.

Originally posted by albufas
i have friends who plays WH with other companys miniatures that are less expensive and in some cases are more cool and detail.
 

Przemas

New member
Originally posted by reverend
For my money the firm has lost all personality. Plain and simple.

exactly what I thought. when I look at the old models I think the sculptors had much more fun making them than they have nowdays.
maybe not so technically perfect it was all about cool ideas, sometimes weird, sometimes funny. they`ve still fit the WH background though.
i don`t like what changes in the \"fluff\" too - t`s getting \"darker and evil\" but rather in stupid and naive sense. its no longer a world I could believe in.

I agree with the most of the points from the first post. the funniest for me is #5 . it`s so f true! usually the latest realeses sell best so keeping them coming for all the people interested seem to be good idea , isn`t it? if i don`t pay dwarves i won`t spend a freaking cent not because I don`t want to , but simply beacuse there`s nothing for me to buy :D.
Chern Ann has also pointed interesting thing - disapearing from the net stores was a strange move for me. it fits the \"self-conceited\" gw politics though.
all in all looks GW is loosing contact with their customers. maybe it`s time for them to remember it`s hobby after all :) ?
 

Trevor

Brushlicker and Freak!
Something else occurred to me, didn\'t they loose a LOT of money on the aborted Warhammer MMORG?

Weird buisness decisions isn\'t exactly new for GW, anyone else remember when they strated their own record label, for heavy metal, at the beginning of the nineties when rock was being replaced by dance? Not a good buisness move...
 

green stuff

New member
Message original : Trevor
anyone else remember when they started their own record label, for heavy metal, at the beginning of the nineties when rock was being replaced by dance?
*** waves hand ***

The label was called \"Earache\".
 

bayrodney

New member
Originally posted by green stuff
Message original : Trevor
anyone else remember when they started their own record label, for heavy metal, at the beginning of the nineties when rock was being replaced by dance?
*** waves hand ***

The label was called \"Earache\".

:eek::eek: Ok...Tell me about this one
This sounds....:|~ lol
 

Ritual

New member
Originally posted by green stuff
Message original : Trevor
anyone else remember when they started their own record label, for heavy metal, at the beginning of the nineties when rock was being replaced by dance?
*** waves hand ***

The label was called \"Earache\".

Nononono!!! Earache has nothing to do with GW! The label was simply called \'Warhammer Records\'. Earache is a quite renowned label that put out some pretty brutal grindcore metal like Napalm Death, Carcass etc. and some industrial metal like Godflesh. One of their bands was called Bolt Thrower who used GW imagery for record sleves etc. Maybe that\'s why you associate Earache with GW? :)

AFAIK Warhammer Records put out one album by Saxon and a couple of albums by some newer unknown bands. I don\'t think the label was very successful. lol
 

green stuff

New member
I\'m sorry to insist Anders, but Bolt Thrower was related to GW and Earache also produced D-Rok (the group that did the tune Ebonbuddha mentionned, it was on the first Space Hulk PC game). Earache was more of the late 80\'s periode, Warhammer Records came after.
 

airhead

Coffin Dodger / Keymaster
Ok, I\'m not a GW player. Let me see if I understand this:

If I buy an army, then there is nothing new for it or nothing I can add until GW redoes the Codex for that army every 6 years or so?

As opposed to MtG where every quarter (3 months), you have to buy a new box set and revamp your decks to remain competitive?

Seems like a company could find the happy medium and make a killing here?
Or would the gamers still whine that the updates were too frequent / not often enough?

???
 

Talion

New member
I must admit I love games-workshop mini, but not their prices.

As for the armies, I don\'t mind that it takes a while for new bits to come out for the various armies, because it takes me forever to paint.

What does annoy the pants off of me is when they do bring out new armies stuff, they don\'t just bring out extra models, they totally redesign the entire model range, so that they look different from the original ones..............and then.............they discontinue the orginal range, so you are left with minis representing the same creature, that look totally different. WHY?????????
 

Ritual

New member
Originally posted by green stuff
I\'m sorry to insist Anders, but Bolt Thrower was related to GW and Earache also produced D-Rok (the group that did the tune Ebonbuddha mentionned, it was on the first Space Hulk PC game). Earache was more of the late 80\'s periode, Warhammer Records came after.
GW had nothing to do with starting and running Earache... Earache came out of the hardcore scene and, maybe since they are also Nottingham based, had a few \'dealings\' with GW, where getting permission to use GW artwork for Bolt Thrower records is one example and the example you mentioned is another. Bolt Thrower also got into some serious problems with GW because of their use of their IP.

Warhammer Records, on the other hand, was closely connected to GW and they were into a more old-school kind of heavy metal.
 

green stuff

New member
@Anders : Since my last post, I took the time to do my homework and check my facts with Google. You seem to be right (sorry :(). But I do recall having a discussion about this with a metal fan (as in fanatic :p) in the early 90\'s. He told me that GW sold their shares in Earache when they saw that it wasn\'t working.
 

EricJ

New member
I think it\'s a sign of the times that I can read about GW troubles and bascially think \"I don\'t care\"

GW used to be an indication of how the hobby was going, but not any longer. It seems the hobby is going stronger than ever in fact even while GW is sliding.

Ummm, no one tell any GD judges I wrote this :rolleyes:
 
M

Molebrain

Guest
I was friends with a couple of the guys in earache, and I have a tshirt around somewhere.

As far as I know they weren\'t associated with GW in any meaningful way.

Zach
www.crookedeye.net
 

dauber22

New member
:(
Well, there goes one New Year\'s resolution down the drain:
\"I will not read any \'GW - Impending Doom\' threads\"
Well, made it to the 9th of January before breaking it. :rolleyes:
 

MarkusTay

New member
Originally posted by Przemas
Originally posted by reverend
For my money the firm has lost all personality. Plain and simple.

exactly what I thought. when I look at the old models I think the sculptors had much more fun making them than they have nowdays. <snip>

This is why I find myself ordering more stuff from their \'specialist\' catalogue then the regular one; the Morheim stuff is the bomb and a lot of the older \'classic\' WH models have so much personality! Those drunken dwarves are the next on my \'to-get list\'.


i don`t like what changes in the \"fluff\" too - t`s getting \"darker and evil\" but rather in stupid and naive sense. its no longer a world I could believe in. <snip>

I don\'t know most of the GW fluff, but I know that the Warmachine fluff is very dark and is based on their award-winning lock-n-load D20 supplement. A dark and Gritty war-torn world on the brink of an industrial revolution. Sounds to me that GW is trying to hop on PP\'s bandwagon.


I agree with the most of the points from the first post. the funniest for me is #5 . it`s so f true! usually the latest realeses sell best so keeping them coming for all the people interested seem to be good idea , isn`t it? if i don`t pay dwarves i won`t spend a freaking cent not because I don`t want to , but simply beacuse there`s nothing for me to buy :D.
Chern Ann has also pointed interesting thing - disapearing from the net stores was a strange move for me. it fits the \"self-conceited\" gw politics though.
all in all looks GW is loosing contact with their customers. maybe it`s time for them to remember it`s hobby after all :) ?
This seems to be a problem with many large corporations and even some governmaents. They do something for awhile that seems to work well, then there is a change in the social/customer climate and they INSIST on traveling down the same straigt and narrow (minded?) path that got where they are. A successful company/gov\'t is able to change dynamically to the needs and wants of its clients. The English invented the Longbow and basically ended the dominance of Knights on the battlefield, hence hurrying the end of the Fuedal period. Great idea; only problem is they were so full of themselves and their new toy that they were the LAST (civilized) army in the world to adopt firearms. What was great yesterday is shite today; a lesson we all need to learn.

Originally posted by funnymouth
i agree with all of the above points, and, in reality i think that the buisness problems that gw is experiencing stem from some combination of all of them. <snip>

my personal pet peeve :flame: is their focus on increasingly large armies. if you want to play the game you need 1850 and up in most cases, thats a lot of minis, a lot of money, and a lot of R&F painting and more importantly an interesting enough line of minis to paint 60+ models. as a matter of preference i prefer things in the \"warband\" size range. because i am a painter and avid converter this makes more sense too - i can have fewer but nicer and more characterful models for each force which allows me to collect a wide variety of different pieces.

This is the \"more is better\" mistake, and is a common business model for companies... just before they go under. I used the example of VooDoo Graphics once before on these forums; a company that was at the top of their game in the early 90\'s and was considered UNBEATABLE. The thing that got them there was the framerates (speed) of their graphics cards; they were at least twice as fast as anything else out there. They kept focusing on their framerates, the thing that made them a success, while other companies concerned themselves with visual quality instead. Their cards kept getting faster, other companies kept getting prettier. Evetually everyone figured out that the human eye only registers about 30 frames a second and anything more is just a waste. Two years after they won a slew of awards for being #1 they went bankrupt and closed their doors forever. It\'s easy to see why GW wants it\'s customers to buy large amounts of figures... quantity over quality. But this will only last so long as they are now realizing, and we can only hope they take their heads out of their collective rumps and take some steps to forestall the impending doom.

We can only hope, because I would miss their bits something aweful, but I doubt they\'ll wise up: Conceit can be quite blinding.

:(
 
Back To Top
Top