Originally posted by funnymouth
it seems obveous that the lotr line is doomed - i think the line is dandy but it just doesnt have staying power with the gamers who will buy the bulk of the minis, and its also too specific; its great materrial but most people want to express their own creativity.
Originally posted by albufas
i have friends who plays WH with other companys miniatures that are less expensive and in some cases are more cool and detail.
Originally posted by reverend
For my money the firm has lost all personality. Plain and simple.
*** waves hand ***Message original : Trevor
anyone else remember when they started their own record label, for heavy metal, at the beginning of the nineties when rock was being replaced by dance?
Originally posted by green stuff
*** waves hand ***Message original : Trevor
anyone else remember when they started their own record label, for heavy metal, at the beginning of the nineties when rock was being replaced by dance?
The label was called \"Earache\".
Originally posted by green stuff
*** waves hand ***Message original : Trevor
anyone else remember when they started their own record label, for heavy metal, at the beginning of the nineties when rock was being replaced by dance?
The label was called \"Earache\".
GW had nothing to do with starting and running Earache... Earache came out of the hardcore scene and, maybe since they are also Nottingham based, had a few \'dealings\' with GW, where getting permission to use GW artwork for Bolt Thrower records is one example and the example you mentioned is another. Bolt Thrower also got into some serious problems with GW because of their use of their IP.Originally posted by green stuff
I\'m sorry to insist Anders, but Bolt Thrower was related to GW and Earache also produced D-Rok (the group that did the tune Ebonbuddha mentionned, it was on the first Space Hulk PC game). Earache was more of the late 80\'s periode, Warhammer Records came after.
Originally posted by Trevor
Something else occurred to me, didn\'t they loose a LOT of money on the aborted Warhammer MMORG?
I stand corrected .Message original : Molebrain
As far as I know they weren\'t associated with GW in any meaningful way.
This seems to be a problem with many large corporations and even some governmaents. They do something for awhile that seems to work well, then there is a change in the social/customer climate and they INSIST on traveling down the same straigt and narrow (minded?) path that got where they are. A successful company/gov\'t is able to change dynamically to the needs and wants of its clients. The English invented the Longbow and basically ended the dominance of Knights on the battlefield, hence hurrying the end of the Fuedal period. Great idea; only problem is they were so full of themselves and their new toy that they were the LAST (civilized) army in the world to adopt firearms. What was great yesterday is shite today; a lesson we all need to learn.Originally posted by Przemas
Originally posted by reverend
For my money the firm has lost all personality. Plain and simple.
exactly what I thought. when I look at the old models I think the sculptors had much more fun making them than they have nowdays. <snip>
This is why I find myself ordering more stuff from their \'specialist\' catalogue then the regular one; the Morheim stuff is the bomb and a lot of the older \'classic\' WH models have so much personality! Those drunken dwarves are the next on my \'to-get list\'.
i don`t like what changes in the \"fluff\" too - t`s getting \"darker and evil\" but rather in stupid and naive sense. its no longer a world I could believe in. <snip>
I don\'t know most of the GW fluff, but I know that the Warmachine fluff is very dark and is based on their award-winning lock-n-load D20 supplement. A dark and Gritty war-torn world on the brink of an industrial revolution. Sounds to me that GW is trying to hop on PP\'s bandwagon.
I agree with the most of the points from the first post. the funniest for me is #5 . it`s so f true! usually the latest realeses sell best so keeping them coming for all the people interested seem to be good idea , isn`t it? if i don`t pay dwarves i won`t spend a freaking cent not because I don`t want to , but simply beacuse there`s nothing for me to buy .
Chern Ann has also pointed interesting thing - disapearing from the net stores was a strange move for me. it fits the \"self-conceited\" gw politics though.
all in all looks GW is loosing contact with their customers. maybe it`s time for them to remember it`s hobby after all ?
Originally posted by funnymouth
i agree with all of the above points, and, in reality i think that the buisness problems that gw is experiencing stem from some combination of all of them. <snip>
my personal pet peeve :flame: is their focus on increasingly large armies. if you want to play the game you need 1850 and up in most cases, thats a lot of minis, a lot of money, and a lot of R&F painting and more importantly an interesting enough line of minis to paint 60+ models. as a matter of preference i prefer things in the \"warband\" size range. because i am a painter and avid converter this makes more sense too - i can have fewer but nicer and more characterful models for each force which allows me to collect a wide variety of different pieces.