Godlikebuthumble
New member
Germany\'s Penal (teehee) Law is pretty clear on that (following the ACC guidelines established after the war):
excerpt, bad translation by yours truly:
§ 86a Use of symbols of unconstitutional organisations
1) Punishable with prison terms of up to three years or fine is any person who,
1. inside the country, spreads or publicly (in assemblings or publicated writing acc. to § 11 point 3) uses Symbols of one of the Parties or organisations described in § 86 pts. 1 Nr. 1, 2 and 4, or who,
2. Inside the country, produces, stores or exports items containing or depicting such symbols for use or distribution within or without the country according to the way described in Nr. 1
(2) Symbols in the meaning of point 1 are specifically flags, insignia, uniform pieces, slogans and greeting formulae. Equivalent to the symbols named in sentence 1 are such as are similar to the point of confusion.
So, badly translated legalese aside, any of the OP incidents (as well as the Walmart lady), would be liable for hard time or a hefty fine in Germany. While understandable, this does make for a kind of arms race between federal organs and crafty (sorta) neo-nazis (or even other groups). Lonsdale sweaters, for example, used to be popular with those guys for a while, because a jacket worn over it would still reveal the LO|NSDA|LE, and to a nazi, that\'s 4/5 of NSDAP... so yeah.
Personally, while I think the SS dress uniforms (apart from riding pants) looked pretty awesome for the time compared to other militaries\' (small wonder - designed by Hugo Boss of all people), wearing any kind of 3rd Reich uniform (outside of sanctioned dramatic context like plays, movies, and, possibly, conventions) is, by historical context alone, if not by law, way beyond simple bad taste.
/wall of text
excerpt, bad translation by yours truly:
§ 86a Use of symbols of unconstitutional organisations
1) Punishable with prison terms of up to three years or fine is any person who,
1. inside the country, spreads or publicly (in assemblings or publicated writing acc. to § 11 point 3) uses Symbols of one of the Parties or organisations described in § 86 pts. 1 Nr. 1, 2 and 4, or who,
2. Inside the country, produces, stores or exports items containing or depicting such symbols for use or distribution within or without the country according to the way described in Nr. 1
(2) Symbols in the meaning of point 1 are specifically flags, insignia, uniform pieces, slogans and greeting formulae. Equivalent to the symbols named in sentence 1 are such as are similar to the point of confusion.
So, badly translated legalese aside, any of the OP incidents (as well as the Walmart lady), would be liable for hard time or a hefty fine in Germany. While understandable, this does make for a kind of arms race between federal organs and crafty (sorta) neo-nazis (or even other groups). Lonsdale sweaters, for example, used to be popular with those guys for a while, because a jacket worn over it would still reveal the LO|NSDA|LE, and to a nazi, that\'s 4/5 of NSDAP... so yeah.
Personally, while I think the SS dress uniforms (apart from riding pants) looked pretty awesome for the time compared to other militaries\' (small wonder - designed by Hugo Boss of all people), wearing any kind of 3rd Reich uniform (outside of sanctioned dramatic context like plays, movies, and, possibly, conventions) is, by historical context alone, if not by law, way beyond simple bad taste.
/wall of text