Man sues Kellogg\'s because Froot Loops has no fruit in it

airhead

Coffin Dodger / Keymaster
Originally posted by Ickthorne
Ok, I\'m going all in. My cookies contain NO GIRL SCOUTS!!! I\'m gona be rollin in it!
Welcome to the forums. Open up with style....
lol
(Thin mints are the bomb...)
But I nice girl scout isn\'t bad either....
 

daddyo

New member
well, the guy does have a point (hiding under his hair, btw)- there is no fruit in fruit loops.

as an aside, while ms feinstein was trying to grab guns, she was issued a carry permit. was she paranoid? hmmm.

and everyone complained that the tort system in mississippi needed reform. the entire legal system in the usa needs a bit dose of chlorine.
 

Shawn R. L.

New member
Originally posted by evil tendencies
Originally posted by cfwheeler58
There was a breakfast cereal called \"KaBoom\" when I was a kid.
The FDA made stores move it to the snack aisle becuase it had
absolutely zero cereal or cereal like substances in it.
They also made them remove any reference to \"cereal\" or \"breakfast food\" from the packaging.
They stopped selling it within a few months.
Moms wouldn\'t pour milk all over a snack and give it to the kids as breakfast.
I\'m not sure it\'s much different than a lot of the crap they sell as cereal today.

Reminds me of the \"Chocolate Frosted Sugar Bombs\" that were featured in Calvin and Hobbes. My favorite was the one where Calvin was shaking from the sugar and he thought Hobbes was the one vibrating.

I seem to remember that Calvin commented to Hobbs that Chocolate Frosted Sugar Bombs weren\'t very good till you put sugar on them!!lol

I do remember a few years back McDonald\'s (the Golden Arches guys) was suing some chap in Britain (Isle of Wight?) who\'s family name was McDonald and had a pub with same name. I never heard the outcome but was definitely hoping that Uber Corp McDonald\'s would get their hat handed to them in a big way!
 

Shawn R. L.

New member
cartoons_calvin_and_hobbes_chocolate_frosted_sugar_bombs_01_sweet1000x333x256.gif
 

darthfoley

New member
Originally posted by fieldarchy
Originally posted by james sequeira
How did this even get to a judge :S


A taleneted and relentless lawyer.

More like a retarded and/or scumbag lawyer.

If you read the follow-up article in which the attorney states his client is not a \'serial litigant\', the attorney actually starts arguing with the interviewer about whether or not Grape-Nuts has nuts in it.
 

evil tendencies

Cake or Death?
Originally posted by darthfoley
If you read the follow-up article in which the attorney states his client is not a \'serial litigant\', the attorney actually starts arguing with the interviewer about whether or not Grape-Nuts has nuts in it.

Well, there certainly is ONE nut there...:rolleyes:
 

freakinacage

New member
Originally posted by darthfoley
Originally posted by fieldarchy
Originally posted by james sequeira
How did this even get to a judge :S


A taleneted and relentless lawyer.

More like a retarded and/or scumbag lawyer.

If you read the follow-up article in which the attorney states his client is not a \'serial litigant\', the attorney actually starts arguing with the interviewer about whether or not Grape-Nuts has nuts in it.
i wouldn\'t say retarded. scumbag, yes, but he must have brains (and no morals)
 
Back To Top
Top