Einion
New member
Wasn't sure which forum this would be best in but I figured it would get most views here so....
Wanted to get any opinions on where to draw the line, if anywhere, on the level of gore on realistic zombie sculpts.
I'm a fan of later zombie films and The Walking Dead which feature very realistic/believable damage to the zombies, from being fed on initially as well as the various things that might have happened to them since they died. Some of it is necessarily gruesome, occasionally really gruesome, but you tend not to see them for very long.
Obviously it's different when it comes to something static like a figure sculpt or a bust and I wonder if anyone thinks there should be a slightly different standard for the most gory of damage, like spilled guts, peeled scalp or chewed muscle?
Thanks in advance!
Einion
Wanted to get any opinions on where to draw the line, if anywhere, on the level of gore on realistic zombie sculpts.
I'm a fan of later zombie films and The Walking Dead which feature very realistic/believable damage to the zombies, from being fed on initially as well as the various things that might have happened to them since they died. Some of it is necessarily gruesome, occasionally really gruesome, but you tend not to see them for very long.
Obviously it's different when it comes to something static like a figure sculpt or a bust and I wonder if anyone thinks there should be a slightly different standard for the most gory of damage, like spilled guts, peeled scalp or chewed muscle?
Thanks in advance!
Einion