Nailpainter2003
New member
<<Rating: 6
The painting is neatly done and looks good.. But some thing wrong with the sculpt. The arms are as thick, as her legs and she does not have a wrist or maybe she just drank too much water and is swollen J who knows. I think that one could expect that the proportions are right one a 54mm scale. But nice paint job anyways u get 7 for that and 5 for the mini that leaves it at a 6.>>
This above comment was left on my painted miniature, THE SUN WORSHIPPER\"S and has happened on many occasions. It only serves as an example of my frustration, not a personal attack on any particular person.
I can understand a person\'s personal preference, likes/dislikes of certain miniatures, but WHY must we, the painter, be critiqued and in turn, ranked for another\'s sculpting efforts??
When I clearly post one of my original sculpts, which will be soon, I expect a thorough examination of anatomical proportion and the like, along with a critique of painting skill; but until then, must we suffer for someone else\'s ability?
Can we not separate the two for voting when one honestly labels a figure with: Original Green; Conversion; Name of Mini Mfg.?
*Okay, rant off*
BTW When I vote on other CMON postings, I only critique a piece on the level of painting skill, except where a conversion, or original sculpt is listed. It makes no sense to me, to penalize a person for something they didn\'t do. And, I rarely vote a piece \'Tabletop Quality\' unless I have difficulty seeing a bad photo. If I\'m unable to decipher the photo at all, usually, I do not vote on the piece....Fot me, this seems more fair than giving a low score.
Sorry, I just don\'t know how to handle this situation and it\'s left me with a feeling of dismay.
Faye
The painting is neatly done and looks good.. But some thing wrong with the sculpt. The arms are as thick, as her legs and she does not have a wrist or maybe she just drank too much water and is swollen J who knows. I think that one could expect that the proportions are right one a 54mm scale. But nice paint job anyways u get 7 for that and 5 for the mini that leaves it at a 6.>>
This above comment was left on my painted miniature, THE SUN WORSHIPPER\"S and has happened on many occasions. It only serves as an example of my frustration, not a personal attack on any particular person.
I can understand a person\'s personal preference, likes/dislikes of certain miniatures, but WHY must we, the painter, be critiqued and in turn, ranked for another\'s sculpting efforts??
When I clearly post one of my original sculpts, which will be soon, I expect a thorough examination of anatomical proportion and the like, along with a critique of painting skill; but until then, must we suffer for someone else\'s ability?
Can we not separate the two for voting when one honestly labels a figure with: Original Green; Conversion; Name of Mini Mfg.?
*Okay, rant off*
BTW When I vote on other CMON postings, I only critique a piece on the level of painting skill, except where a conversion, or original sculpt is listed. It makes no sense to me, to penalize a person for something they didn\'t do. And, I rarely vote a piece \'Tabletop Quality\' unless I have difficulty seeing a bad photo. If I\'m unable to decipher the photo at all, usually, I do not vote on the piece....Fot me, this seems more fair than giving a low score.
Sorry, I just don\'t know how to handle this situation and it\'s left me with a feeling of dismay.
Faye