The differant \"Styles\" of painting?

DwarfMan1

New member
Well, I have heard about a bunch of differant \"styles\" like the Foundry style, the French style, the Rackham style, the Citadel style etc...

Can someone give me some help sorting all of these out? I usually paint in the Foundry Style, and don\'t know much about the others but would LOVE to be able to paint in the French style... So can someone also direct me to some good tutorials?

Thanks!
 

lono

New member
What\'s the Foundry style?

And yeah, I agree with Matty, define your own style, don\'t try and copy someone elses. As for tutorials, there are tutorials by French painters on the site, I don\'t think they will help you paint in the \'French style\' though.
 

Ogrebane

New member
I think certain companies have distinct styles. Like GW use metals and very bright highlights and Rackman use NMM and lots of pastel type colors but as every one else has said do it your way. I do it my way just wish I could do my way better. Good luck maybe post a pic of the different styles eh??
 

DwarfMan1

New member
What\'s the Foundry style?

For an example of the \"Foundry\" style, check out this picture from my CMON gallery:

http://coolminiornot.com/157643

You rarely ever use washes, glazes or drybrushes, and concentrate on layering. I usually use between 3 and 5 layers on each \"part\" of the figure.

The main aim of the Foundry style is to make sure that the model looks good on the gaming table, not close up... so all of the colors are exagerated a bit so that from 3 feet away the model looks very detailed and all that.:)

Hope that answers it!
 

matty1001

New member
@Dwarfman: To me that is Steve Deans style, not Foundrys.

Yep, thas what its all about, create something that is yours, not somebody\'s elses.

Don\'t know why you would want a French style anyway, there all....well French :p
 

MathewBaich

New member
I do like the way cyril does his gritty and dirty effects and I really like painting that way myself. But i add my own personal flavor to it.:beer:
 

Gilvan Blight

New member
Originally posted by matty1001
@Dwarfman: To me that is Steve Deans style, not Foundrys.

I think that this style isn\'t Dean\'s alone, though I personally could consider him the master. Witchhunter also paints in a similar style, and guess what, he paints Foundry Figs as well. There is one other painter, who does a lot of Dr. Who, name escapes me that I think also follows this style. Now each does it a bit different and has their own \'style\' but there is an overall effect similarity.

If you asked me before now what the Foundry Style was I probably couldn\'t tell you, but thinking about it I think Dwarfman has a good definition.

About the GW style. I would say there is an \'Eavy Metal Masterclass Style, and a Studio Army style, but tons of their stuff is done to so many different levels of painting that I can\'t say they have an overall style. They still put out lots of stuff with just ink washes and drybrushing.
 

DaN

New member
Or there\'s the always popular:

\"Messy\" style :p

Which has several subsections, such as:

\"Dipped in masonry paint\" look
\"Dipped in Poly cement\" look
\"Blowtorched\" look
\"Has anyone seen my glass eye\" look
\"John Blanche\" style lol
 

NerdyOgre254

New member
Good one DaN, exactly what i used to think.
I don\'t know what my style is. i\'ve been painting for a while now and yet i still reckon that i suck. I just use whatever i think works.
 

DaRat

New member
I\'ve heard the Foundry style also referred to as the Dallimore or English style.

I thought that the French style was the same as the Rackham style. Perhaps the Rackham website has a good tutorial or one of the Confrontation books? My very superficial understanding is that the Rackham style is many, many, many layers of extremely thin paint.

I think that the basic Citadel style is base coat, a wash, and some drybrushing. At least, that appears to be what they try to teach newbies. :)
 

DwarfMan1

New member
Originally posted by Gilvan Blight
Originally posted by matty1001
@Dwarfman: To me that is Steve Deans style, not Foundrys.

I think that this style isn\'t Dean\'s alone, though I personally could consider him the master. Witchhunter also paints in a similar style, and guess what, he paints Foundry Figs as well. There is one other painter, who does a lot of Dr. Who, name escapes me that I think also follows this style. Now each does it a bit different and has their own \'style\' but there is an overall effect similarity.

If you asked me before now what the Foundry Style was I probably couldn\'t tell you, but thinking about it I think Dwarfman has a good definition.

The guy who you are talking about (I think!) is Kevin Dallimore... he wrote a big \'ol book on the subject.:)

And, in fact, IIRC Steve Dean and Kevin Dallimore are from the same gaming club and share lots of ideas etc...
 

Gilvan Blight

New member
Originally posted by vincegamer
so what is my style closest to?

The CMON style.

Whever we incorporate every other style and just try to paint minis that look good.

Drybrusing is a big no-no.
Layering is generally the prefered method of shading and hilighting.
Inks can be used as long as they don\'t make things glossy.
Dull-Coat is a must.
The goal is to have a mini that looks almost as good up close as it does far away and have this show in a picture.

There is also the extreme CMON style, where people over exagerate the highlights and add in reflections that only truely work in a 2D image of a mini and not as well on the 3d model itself. These minis tend to actually look better close up, as the extreme hilighting adds too much contrast when at further then arms length.

What I find the biggest part of your style Vince is your choice of what to paint, way more so then how it\'s painted.
 

Sand Rat

New member
Well, I like the \"paint it with a Q-Tip\" style personally


At least thats what my minis look like when I take a picture of them.
 

BaT

New member
I believe the french style of painting involves licking your brush before each application of paint.

Someone had to say it....lol
 

Severatus

New member
I prefer my style, \" All American Hack \"
style.

Style is all about function, How many hours, how much money, how much interest.

The French and Spanish painters hate my minis with a passion but, funny thing is I sell most minis to clients overseas in these countries. Just the power of the Euro Im sure.

Why blend every aspect of a miniature that was created for general consumption like GW, I only blend for Tom Miere minis!

Actually I try not to blend too often.

In my experience most people cannot see half the details on most minis anyways and blending just make it that much more difficult. You dont get paid for things u they cant see.

Be bold, keep yer hand steady & yer paints thinned down and nobody will care if you dont blend.

Actually most buyers dont pay more for such careful blending.

Miniatures are flimsy investments at best but, godd bless the collectors.

Honestly I think 99% of these models would not last more than 30 years.

One who has studied Conservation know that modern paints are not tested for longevity, it\'s all about whats new.

The chemistry involved can get very shifty over time due to the nature of the Pigments, Medium, Binders, Finger prints, Primers,oxygen, dust, sunlight, Cheeto Fingers, Pizza Hands, clumsy 12 foot industrial tape meausures wielded by sweaty nervous gamers ohhh... and sloping terrain such as hills and such.

If yer concerned about your Niche in the mini biz don\'t be. Style won\'t prevent the drop in the dollar - rise of the Euro and change in priorities of the buying public.

I Gotta get to Poland, that way I can afford to sell a $35.00 mounted General GW miniature for $150.00 painted to a 8 and be very pleased about it.

Find your own style Niche and you will have much more fun wasting yer time.

Not every buyer wants a photo real quality to their minis, just looking good as a mini is good enough.
 
Back To Top
Top