Nute & Assault Order

[Lleman]

Given the Nute card text and the Assault Order text (from Victarion's tactics cards)



Should one understand that given the tactic card doesn't target Nute's unit but triggers a zone effect that targets it, Nute's unit doesn't eventually benefit from Victarion's Charge Action ?

 

[Valenae]

Everyone know that

More of that there is man in Nigh Watch that do nothing at all. It is Satin Commanders Steward.

By raw it counts as your commander not as <commander name>.
And there is no cards that interacts with your commander in NW deck.
That cards is in Neutral Deck only now.

 

[Lleman]

Everyone know that

Well, obviously I didn't and so didn't a good few of my fellow players, so thanks for the condescension.
That was also a question, not an affirmation, since one could possibly wonder if that was a wording issue (not an unknown occurrence) or a purposeful intent from the authors to limit Nute's use of Victarion's tactical cards to two out of three.
Accessorily, since there is obviously another similar issue with another character, one could also hope for the author to give a clear-cut answer to this issue some time.

 

[Valenae]

Im sure that it dont intended.
But before they clarify this in faq Assault Orders dont targer Satin and Nute...

 

[Hecaton]

Well, obviously I didn't and so didn't a good few of my fellow players, so thanks for the condescension.
That was also a question, not an affirmation, since one could possibly wonder if that was a wording issue (not an unknown occurrence) or a purposeful intent from the authors to limit Nute's use of Victarion's tactical cards to two out of three.
Accessorily, since there is obviously another similar issue with another character, one could also hope for the author to give a clear-cut answer to this issue some time.

Nah, they'll just get mad at you for nitpicking and daring to ask that question.

 

[bohms27]

There was a recent Errata/FAQ Update that addresses this. Nute CAN charge with assault orders.

 

[Lleman]

There was a recent Errata/FAQ Update that addresses this. Nute CAN charge with assault orders.

I wonder what errata/FAQs you're thinking about since neither the superseded FAQ_2021_V1.0 nor the FAQ_2021_S01_v2 contain anything about it. Neither does the 2021-S01_Updates-1 with its design notes. No sarcasm implied but I'm all for your posting the relevant ruling about that, mate.

Edit: Well bugger that, turns out there's been an update indeed (FAQ_2021-S01-1) and the Vassal wording has definitely solved the issue.
Thanks for making me check the "documents" page again.

 

[bohms27]

I wonder what errata/FAQs you're thinking about since neither the superseded FAQ_2021_V1.0 nor the FAQ_2021_S01_v2 contain anything about it. Neither does the 2021-S01_Updates-1 with its design notes. No sarcasm implied but I'm all for your posting the relevant ruling about that, mate.

Edit: Well bugger that, turns out there's been an update indeed (FAQ_2021-S01-1) and the Vassal wording has definitely solved the issue.
Thanks for making me check the "documents" page again.

no problem they kind of updated it stealthily lol only reason I knew is because people mentioned it in discord.