Hi, I have been lurking on these forums for a while and have come up with a question that I can\'t find an answer for anywhere, so here goes:
I returned to painting miniatures a few weeks ago (after having a break of about 2 years, although i have been painting consistently on canvas). One difference between painting on canvas and miniatures, is that with miniatures a smooth transition of blending is a more desirable finish. So I have been spending time getting this technique down. I have been practicing on horses (using Jason Richards\' technique) since there are large surfaces on them and it seems like a good practice point. My problem is that I work with very thinned down paint. This seems to result (when I have finished the blending) in the colours looking very bland and lacking luster luster. I have a feeling that applying a gloss varnish, and then a matt varnish will help this. However I also find that my highlights are seem to look very washed out, even though the transition is invisible they look terrible because the colours look so bleeched. Is this my technique, too much water or my paints to blame? I seem to remember that you can buy an acrylic thinner that keeps the colour in the paint better than water, but I can\'t remember (I am not too keen on using inks because although a different pigment is used that keeps it\'s colour better, it tends to give a glossy sheen). The overall finished result looks very unprofessional even though the blend is quite good.
So my second part of the question is that I look to a lot of classical paintings for inspiration. For example when painting a horse i looked at WhistleJacket by George Stubbs. When you look at his paintings of horses there are some very bright highlights , where the light reflects off the glossy coat. When I try and achieve this using thinned paint i get a very blurred highlight that doesn\'t match that of the paintings. Is there any advise for creating a smooth transition but with a high contrast?
Thanks for all advise, I will be greatly appreciated,
Will
I returned to painting miniatures a few weeks ago (after having a break of about 2 years, although i have been painting consistently on canvas). One difference between painting on canvas and miniatures, is that with miniatures a smooth transition of blending is a more desirable finish. So I have been spending time getting this technique down. I have been practicing on horses (using Jason Richards\' technique) since there are large surfaces on them and it seems like a good practice point. My problem is that I work with very thinned down paint. This seems to result (when I have finished the blending) in the colours looking very bland and lacking luster luster. I have a feeling that applying a gloss varnish, and then a matt varnish will help this. However I also find that my highlights are seem to look very washed out, even though the transition is invisible they look terrible because the colours look so bleeched. Is this my technique, too much water or my paints to blame? I seem to remember that you can buy an acrylic thinner that keeps the colour in the paint better than water, but I can\'t remember (I am not too keen on using inks because although a different pigment is used that keeps it\'s colour better, it tends to give a glossy sheen). The overall finished result looks very unprofessional even though the blend is quite good.
So my second part of the question is that I look to a lot of classical paintings for inspiration. For example when painting a horse i looked at WhistleJacket by George Stubbs. When you look at his paintings of horses there are some very bright highlights , where the light reflects off the glossy coat. When I try and achieve this using thinned paint i get a very blurred highlight that doesn\'t match that of the paintings. Is there any advise for creating a smooth transition but with a high contrast?
Thanks for all advise, I will be greatly appreciated,
Will